🔗 Share this article

Sunday 30 January 1972 remains one of the most fatal – and momentous – days throughout thirty years of conflict in this area.

In the streets of the incident – the memories of the tragic events are displayed on the structures and embedded in collective memory.

A protest demonstration was conducted on a chilly yet clear afternoon in the city.

The march was challenging the policy of internment – detaining individuals without legal proceedings – which had been put in place in response to an extended period of unrest.

Soldiers from the Parachute Regiment shot dead thirteen individuals in the neighborhood – which was, and still is, a predominantly nationalist community.

A specific visual became especially prominent.

Pictures showed a religious figure, the priest, displaying a stained with blood cloth while attempting to defend a assembly moving a teenager, the fatally wounded individual, who had been killed.

News camera operators captured considerable film on the day.

Documented accounts contains the priest informing a journalist that troops "just seemed to discharge weapons randomly" and he was "absolutely certain" that there was no reason for the gunfire.

That version of events was rejected by the original examination.

The Widgery Tribunal determined the soldiers had been shot at first.

Throughout the negotiation period, the administration set up another inquiry, following pressure by bereaved relatives, who said Widgery had been a cover-up.

In 2010, the conclusion by the inquiry said that generally, the soldiers had fired first and that not one of the victims had been armed.

At that time Prime Minister, the leader, issued an apology in the government chamber – stating fatalities were "improper and inexcusable."

Authorities started to investigate the incident.

An ex-soldier, known as Soldier F, was prosecuted for murder.

He was charged over the fatalities of one victim, 22, and 26-year-old the second individual.

The accused was additionally charged of attempting to murder multiple individuals, other civilians, further individuals, another person, and an unidentified individual.

Remains a court ruling maintaining the defendant's anonymity, which his lawyers have claimed is necessary because he is at threat.

He stated to the investigation that he had solely shot at people who were carrying weapons.

This assertion was dismissed in the official findings.

Information from the examination was unable to be used immediately as proof in the court case.

In court, the defendant was hidden from public using a protective barrier.

He made statements for the opening instance in the hearing at a hearing in that month, to reply "innocent" when the accusations were put to him.

Relatives of those who were killed on that day journeyed from Derry to Belfast Crown Court each day of the trial.

John Kelly, whose relative was killed, said they always knew that hearing the trial would be painful.

"I remember the events in my mind's eye," John said, as we walked around the main locations discussed in the trial – from Rossville Street, where the victim was killed, to the nearby the courtyard, where James Wray and the second person were died.

"It reminds me to my location that day.

"I helped to carry the victim and place him in the vehicle.

"I went through every moment during the evidence.

"But even with enduring all that – it's still meaningful for me."