🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's parliament members have decided to pull out from an international accord designed to safeguard females from violence, including domestic abuse, following prolonged and heated debates in the parliament.

Thousands of protesters gathered in Riga this week to voice disagreement with the decision. The ultimate decision now rests with Head of State the nation's president, who must determine whether to endorse or veto the legislation.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only took effect in Latvia last year, mandating authorities to develop laws and assistance programs to eliminate all types of violence.

The Baltic nation has become the initial EU country to begin the process of withdrawing from the convention. Turkey withdrew in 2021, a move that rights groups characterized as a major setback for women's rights.

Political Controversy and Opposition

The treaty was approved by the European Union in last year, yet traditionalist factions have argued that its focus on gender equality weakens traditional families and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Saeima, lawmakers voted by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the treaty, a move sponsored by political opponents but supported by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The result represents a defeat for moderate conservative government leader the nation's PM, who stood with demonstrators outside parliament earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that violence will not prevail," she stated to the assembly.

Ideological Divisions and Responses

One of the primary parties supporting the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose head has urged the public to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with multiple sexes".

Latvia's ombudswoman the rights official urged the agreement not to be politicized, while the group the rights organization stated it was "not a danger to national principles, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The Thursday's decision has sparked broad outcry both within Latvia and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand people have signed a national appeal calling for the treaty to be maintained. The women's rights organization the rights center has announced a demonstration for the coming week, charging MPs of disregarding the will of the Latvian people.

Global Worries and Possible Next Steps

The leader of the European organization's legislative body stated that the Baltic state had made a rash choice fueled by misinformation. He described it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning step backward for female equality and fundamental freedoms in the continent".

He noted that since Turkey abandoned the treaty four years ago, instances of femicide and abuse targeting females had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not achieve a supermajority support, the president could potentially return the legislation for additional review if he holds concerns.

President the national leader announced on social media that he would evaluate the decision according to constitutional principles, "considering state and legal factors, instead of ideological or political viewpoints".

Recently, another member of the governing alliance, the Progressives, indicated it would not rule out petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a worrisome situation for gender equality not only in Latvia but across Europe," stated a human rights activist.

• Family violence rates have been rising in several European nations
• The European treaty requires particular safeguards for victims of domestic abuse
• Latvia's decision could influence similar discussions in other member states