🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie Botts is an charming small “ham sandwich”. Orion – called “Onion Ring” – is a big but guardian-like friend. Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and moves like a worm. Lillooet the beluga is the “loving presence” with a heart of gold.

A group of thirty captive marine mammals in a Canada-based amusement park have been entangled in a disagreement between a shuttered park, local and national governments and animal rights activists.

But those most familiar with the whales say the impassioned debate over their fate often fails to consider the nuances of the whales who, after growing up in confinement, have been carefully observed by the humans who work with them regularly.

After the national authorities disallowed the sale of the belugas to a foreign facility, the embattled amusement park near Niagara Falls where they are housed stated it would consider to end their lives unless the authorities pays for the upkeep of their survival. The nation’s marine resources official has refused that ultimatum, placing the thirty whales in an dangerously unstable circumstance.

Highly Cognitive Marine Mammals

Scientists say that beluga whales’ neuroanatomy, along with their vocal imitation skills, problem solving and group interactions point to they are remarkably smart mammals – something a former trainer observed personally.

She spent a significant period as a whale caretaker, a job that involved earning the trust of the marine predators.

“Establishing those relationships over time takes a lot of regularity and a lot of affection. At the beginning, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain shared confidence. And they start being more vulnerable with you. It’s just so wonderful and fulfilling.”

The trainer knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was nevertheless surprised by the details and unique traits in their dispositions. She cultivated a deep bond for two female belugas with different personalities.

“Eve chose me. Cleo demanded work,” she said. “Both transformed the way I perceive relationships.”

Growing Opposition and Deteriorating Conditions

Burgess’s interaction with the whales progressed against a background of increasing societal concern to their enclosure.

During her tenure at the facility, multiple belugas and the park’s one killer whale, Kiska, passed away. In all, nineteen belugas have perished at the park since 2019, a statistic which the park ascribes to natural mortality, but which campaigners say reflects the inadequate care in which they were housed.

The facility did not operate to the visitors over the summer, but the former trainer says she observed directly consequences of the shutdown. “Concrete is falling apart from the tanks because they’re falling apart and not being fixed. The whales are exploratory and so they take pieces and move about with chunks in their jaws. It’s upsetting to see.”

The park did not reply to a inquiry, but previously stated: “The whales … get far superior medical attention and constant attention than any individual in the UK, or other places.”

Fate in Limbo and Proposed Solutions

The former employee was dismissed from the park in recent months following the demise of a beluga, an unwell beluga the caretakers had to humanely kill. She said the park thought particulars of the death were disclosed to the press and she was fired not long after.

The uncertainty over the whales’ fate has left Burgess and other caretakers in anguish. She says the facility’s ultimatum to kill its whales is a negotiation tactic and is a “logistically impossible” endeavor, adding any efforts to put down even a one beluga would require “immense staff”, equipment and heavy equipment.

“It cannot happen in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.

She supports calls for the whales to be removed immediately from the park, with its deteriorating pools and dwindling staff.

In the autumn, Canada’s government official rejected a proposal to transfer the whales to an overseas location.

“To approve the request would have meant a continued situation in confinement and a reversion to performance for audiences,” the minister stated. “As Canadians, we know that whales are meant for the wild, not in enclosures for our enjoyment. I could not in clear conscience authorize an export that would prolong the conditions these belugas have experienced.”

But the former trainer said the official’s remarks reveal a wider lack of awareness of the facts of living conditions for belugas living their whole lives in enclosures.

“The people needs to understand these are whales that have existed solely in enclosed habitats and they will need human care for the foreseeable future,” she said. “The public just don’t realize that it’s not as straightforward as saying ‘shut it down’.”

Sanctuary Proposal and Continuing Discussion

As decision makers attempt to find a answer, ideas have been put forward, some of which have minimal feasibility. A suggested plan called for the belugas to be released into the open waters of the Arctic – where whales are a primary resource of nourishment for local populations.

A suggested refuge in the province of Nova Scotia, which has received regulatory clearance, has been highly debated. The prospective location, which includes 100 acres of enclosed sea water, is not yet built. Proponents remain hopeful that it could ultimately represent a permanent resolution for eight of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among caretakers she’s spoken with, there is “doubts there” about what she said is “simply an untested concept” in the whales’ well-being.

Others say the possibility of a sanctuary represents a broader global shift away from animal displays and could represent a viable plan in the near future.

The project lead, director of the plan, said the facility will simulate the intellectual stimulation and nutrition the whales receive from caretakers, albeit in a much larger area. He said after the well-being of whales is thoroughly evaluated, which could take months|an extended period|